There’s been a lot of talk about Artificial Intelligence recently, and it occurred to me that fiction writers have been creating Artificial Intelligences for centuries. They’re called ‘characters’. All right, so they are not interactive in the conventional sense, but they still have to pass the Turing Test.
I shall be attending this year’s CrimeFest Crime Fiction Convention from the 14th to the 17th of May this year, and speaking on the panel ‘Crafting Crime: The Art Of Writing Crime Fiction‘ at 9:00 a.m. on the 15th. Don’t hesitate to stop and say ‘Hello’.
In the meantime, I am the featured author on the Crime Readers Association website for the whole of the month of April. Two blog posts are already live on the site: Lights, Camera, Write! and The Mystery of the Locked Room Mystery.
Update There are now two more of my posts on the Crime Readers Association website: The Butler Did It and Hidden In Plain Sight. Plus a bonus post from my fellow Grey Cells Press author Charlie Garratt: My Writing History.
Recently, there was a petition circulating on-line bewailing the lack of television coverage in the UK on the subject of books. In particular, the petition called on the BBC to consider a regular television programme that would be dedicated to books and reading.
I signed the petition, but I did wonder what the point of this programme might be. ‘To promote books and reading’ is the obvious answer, but I don’t know if a television programme could actually deliver that. Worse, I fear it might do the opposite, and give the impression that reading is a minority activity that needs to be shuffled off to its own little niche in the broadcast schedules, well out of the way of normal folk.
My fear stems from the fact that, as far as I can imagine, there are only four things that a television programme about books can provide. These are:
Reviews of books
Interviews with authors
Readings of extracts from books
‘Round-table’ discussions on literary subjects
For the life of me, I can’t think of anything else that a book programme could do beyond those four themes.
That’s fine, you might say, that’s all a book program needs—but wouldn’t a programme that consists almost exclusively of a round of reviews, interviews, readings and discussions be—let’s not beat around the bush—a bit dull? Dull in terms of being poor television, I mean. Book reviews, I believe, are better served by the written media—either print or on-line—rather than someone delivering a ‘piece to camera’. Listening to the author read his own work is great, but that can be done with better effect on the radio. So what is there in that earnest parade of talking heads praising the books they’ve read to make the non-reading public think ‘Gosh, that looks interesting. I must read more books’? Very little, as far as I can see.
Television is primarily a visual medium, but the only overtly visual aspect to a book is the cover—everything else happens in the imagination. It’s quite likely that dramatic adaptations of novels—like the current BBC production of Wolf Hall—will sell more books and get more people reading than a dedicated book programme. Not everyone’s novel can receive the big budget treatment (more’s the pity), but it is surely a step in the right direction.
I’m not against the BBC providing more programmes about books (I did sign the petition, after all) but I do wonder what good such a programme would do. Unless someone can devise the equivalent of a ‘Strictly Come Dancing’ for books, I fear that any book programme on television will struggle with a tiny production budget, shunted away to a graveyard slot in the schedules, and consequently watched by a tiny audience.
After all, most book lovers prefer to read books, not watch television.
At the end of October the members of the writer’s website ‘Authonomy’ organised an on-line writers’ conference amongst themselves, to discuss all manner of issues that perplex and confound the inexperienced writer. The discussions covered subjects as diverse as ‘What Makes a Good Character’ to ‘How to Keep your Plot On Track’, and a lot of information was exchanged and a lot of tricky questions were answered in the process.
I volunteered to lead the session called ‘Dialogue: How to Get It to Sound Right’ and compiled a set of notes to help getting the discussion started. I know that a number of people from Authonomy are interested in downloading their own copy of the notes from the seminar (and I am sure that there are people outside Authonomy who will find them useful) so I have converted them into a PDF file (just five pages long) and made them available for download.
You can read the notes for this seminar if you click on this link here or you can download the file by right-clicking on the link and downloading with the ‘Save Link As…’ option.
If there’s anyone out there in the mighty Blogosphere who’d like to interview me or write an honest review of A Fistful of Seaweed, then please get in touch by leaving a comment or via twitter: @johnbayliss5 .